I have recently been looking into some of our own bills and laws
passed by the Senate and Congress out of my own curiosity. Guided by
many independent sites on which bills to read, I have been shown many
disgusting truths on our own government: left publicly for all to see, but no
one to look.
Throughout this hefty post, I will post excerpts of
many legal documents unmodified, with the source below. You be the judge.
I will start with National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2012 AKA HR 1540. The plan of this bill was to address the following:
"To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for
military activities of the Department of Defense and for military construction,
to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 2012, and for other
purposes."
However, in the following section, they just so happened to slip
in that the president has full authority to use the military
at his will, thus removing an important part of the checks and balances our
country ran on.
"SEC. 1034. AFFIRMATION OF ARMED CONFLICT WITH AL-QAEDA,
THE TALIBAN, AND ASSOCIATED FORCES.
Congress affirms that--
(1) the United States is engaged in an armed conflict with
al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces and that those entities continue
to pose a threat to the United States and its citizens, both domestically and
abroad;
(2) the President has the authority to use all necessary and
appropriate force during the current armed conflict with al-Qaeda, the Taliban,
and associated forces pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force
(Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note);
(3) the current armed conflict includes nations, organization,
and persons who--
(A) are part of, or are substantially supporting, al-Qaeda, the
Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the
United States or its coalition partners; or
(B) have engaged in hostilities or have directly supported
hostilities in aid of a nation, organization, or person described in subparagraph
(A); and
(4) the President’s authority pursuant to the Authorization for
Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note)
includes the authority to detain belligerents, including persons described in
paragraph (3), until the termination of hostilities."
Next, I will look at the all famous "Patriot Act."
This bill was created "to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United
States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools,
and for other purposes." This bill was pre-written prior to 9/11
(otherwise it would have to have been written in 9 days, consisting
of 61,187 words, and ~6,799 words written per day. Unlikely.) and was
sitting dormant until the attacks when the people of the United States
were traumatized, how could they not vote for an act with a title like "The
Patriot Act." However, this act took away many of our liberties as shown
below:
"SEC. 203. AUTHORITY TO SHARE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE
INFORMATION.
(a) AUTHORITY TO SHARE GRAND JURY INFORMATION-
(1) IN GENERAL- Rule 6(e)(3)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure is amended to read as follows:
`(C)(i) Disclosure otherwise prohibited by this rule of matters
occurring before the grand jury may also be made--
`(I) when so directed by a court preliminarily to or in
connection with a judicial proceeding;
`(II) when permitted by a court at the request of the defendant,
upon a showing that grounds may exist for a motion to dismiss the indictment
because of matters occurring before the grand jury;
`(III) when the disclosure is made by an attorney for the
government to another Federal grand jury;
`(IV) when permitted by a court at the request of an attorney
for the government, upon a showing that such matters may disclose a violation
of state criminal law, to an appropriate official of a state or subdivision of
a state for the purpose of enforcing such law; or
`(V) when the matters involve foreign intelligence or
counterintelligence (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of
1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a)), or foreign intelligence information (as defined in
clause (iv) of this subparagraph), to any Federal law enforcement,
intelligence, protective, immigration, national defense, or national security
official in order to assist the official receiving that information in the
performance of his official duties.
`(ii) If the court orders disclosure of matters occurring before
the grand jury, the disclosure shall be made in such manner, at such time, and
under such conditions as the court may direct.
`(iii) Any Federal official to whom information is disclosed
pursuant to clause (i)(V) of this subparagraph may use that information only as
necessary in the conduct of that person's official duties subject to any
limitations on the unauthorized disclosure of such information. Within a
reasonable time after such disclosure, an attorney for the government shall
file under seal a notice with the court stating the fact that such information
was disclosed and the departments, agencies, or entities to which the disclosure
was made.
`(iv) In clause (i)(V) of this subparagraph, the term `foreign
intelligence information' means--
`(I) information, whether or not concerning a United States
person, that relates to the ability of the United States to protect against--
`(aa) actual or potential attack or other grave hostile acts
of-a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power;
`(bb) sabotage or international terrorism by a foreign power or
an agent of a foreign power; or
`(cc) clandestine intelligence activities by an intelligence
service or network of a foreign power or by an agent of foreign power; or
`(II) information, whether or not concerning a United States
person, with respect to a foreign power or foreign territory that relates to--
`(aa) the national defense or the security of the United States;
or
`(bb) the conduct of the foreign affairs of the United States.'.
(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- Rule 6(e)(3)(D) of the Federal Rules
of Criminal Procedure is amended by striking `(e)(3)(C)(i)' and inserting
`(e)(3)(C)(i)(I)'.
(b) AUTHORITY TO SHARE ELECTRONIC, WIRE, AND
ORAL INTERCEPTION INFORMATION-
(1) LAW ENFORCEMENT- Section 2517 of title 18, United States
Code, is amended by inserting at the end the following:
`(6) Any investigative or law enforcement
officer, or attorney for the Government, who by any means authorized by this
chapter, has obtained knowledge of the contents of any wire, oral, or
electronic communication, or evidence derived therefrom, may disclose such
contents to any other Federal law enforcement, intelligence, protective,
immigration, national defense, or national security official to the extent that
such contents include foreign intelligence or counterintelligence (as defined
in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a)), or foreign
intelligence information (as defined in subsection (19) of section 2510 of this
title), to assist the official who is to receive that information in the
performance of his official duties. Any Federal official who receives
information pursuant to this provision may use that information only as
necessary in the conduct of that person's official duties subject to any
limitations on the unauthorized disclosure of such information.'.
(2) DEFINITION- Section 2510 of title 18, United States Code, is
amended by--
(A) in paragraph (17), by striking `and' after the semicolon;
(B) in paragraph (18), by striking the period and inserting `;
and'; and
(C) by inserting at the end the following:
`(19) `foreign intelligence information' means--
`(A) information, whether or not concerning a United States
person, that relates to the ability of the United States to protect against--
`(i) actual or potential attack or other grave hostile acts of a
foreign power or an agent of a foreign power;
`(ii) sabotage or international terrorism by a foreign power or
an agent of a foreign power; or
`(iii) clandestine intelligence activities by an intelligence
service or network of a foreign power or by an agent of a foreign power; or
`(B) information, whether or not concerning a United States
person, with respect to a foreign power or foreign territory that relates to--
`(i) the national defense or the security of the United States;
or
`(ii) the conduct of the foreign affairs of the United States.'.
(c) PROCEDURES- The Attorney General shall establish procedures
for the disclosure of information pursuant to section 2517(6) and Rule
6(e)(3)(C)(i)(V) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that identifies a
United States person, as defined in section 101 of the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801)).
(d) FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION-
(1) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding any other provision of law, it
shall be lawful for foreign intelligence or counterintelligence (as defined in
section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a)) or foreign
intelligence information obtained as part of a criminal investigation to be
disclosed to any Federal law enforcement, intelligence, protective,
immigration, national defense, or national security official in order to assist
the official receiving that information in the performance of his official
duties. Any Federal official who receives information pursuant to this
provision may use that information only as necessary in the conduct of that
person's official duties subject to any limitations on the unauthorized
disclosure of such information.
(2) DEFINITION- In this subsection, the term `foreign
intelligence information' means--
(A) information, whether or not concerning a United States
person, that relates to the ability of the United States to protect against--
(i) actual or potential attack or other grave hostile acts of a
foreign power or an agent of a foreign power;
(ii) sabotage or international terrorism by a foreign power or
an agent of a foreign power; or
(iii) clandestine intelligence activities by an intelligence
service or network of a foreign power or by an agent of a foreign power; or
(B) information, whether or not concerning a United States
person, with respect to a foreign power or foreign territory that relates to--
(i) the national defense or the security of the United States;
or
(ii) the conduct of the foreign affairs of the United
States."
The next section allows police to walk right in and search,
without a warrant. No big deal, right? Heh.
"SEC. 213. AUTHORITY FOR DELAYING NOTICE OF THE EXECUTION
OF A WARRANT.
Section 3103a of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by inserting `(a) IN GENERAL- ' before `In addition'; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
`(b) DELAY- With respect to the issuance of any warrant or court
order under this section, or any other rule of law, to search for and seize any
property or material that constitutes evidence of a criminal offense in
violation of the laws of the United States, any notice required, or that may be
required, to be given may be delayed if--
`(1) the court finds reasonable cause to believe that providing
immediate notification of the execution of the warrant may have an adverse
result (as defined in section 2705);
`(2) the warrant prohibits the seizure of any tangible property,
any wire or electronic communication (as defined in section 2510), or, except
as expressly provided in chapter 121, any stored wire or electronic information,
except where the court finds reasonable necessity for the seizure; and
`(3) the warrant provides for the giving of such notice within a
reasonable period of its execution, which period may thereafter be extended by
the court for good cause shown.'."
Next, our right to Habeas Corpus is revoked. Luckily, this was
effective only until December 31, 2005. JK. The next year they
revoked it in the Military Commissions act of 2006. Ah well. There goes
that.
"SEC. 412. MANDATORY DETENTION OF
SUSPECTED TERRORISTS; HABEAS CORPUS; JUDICIAL REVIEW.
(a) IN GENERAL- The Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1101 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 236 the following:
`MANDATORY DETENTION OF SUSPECTED TERRORISTS; HABEAS CORPUS; JUDICIAL
REVIEW
`SEC. 236A. (a) DETENTION OF TERRORIST ALIENS-
`(1) CUSTODY- The Attorney General shall take into custody any
alien who is certified under paragraph (3).
`(2) RELEASE- Except as provided in paragraphs (5) and (6), the
Attorney General shall maintain custody of such an alien until the alien is
removed from the United States. Except as provided in paragraph (6), such
custody shall be maintained irrespective of any relief from removal for which
the alien may be eligible, or any relief from removal granted the alien, until
the Attorney General determines that the alien is no longer an alien who may be
certified under paragraph (3). If the alien is finally determined not to be
removable, detention pursuant to this subsection shall terminate.
`(3) CERTIFICATION- The Attorney General may certify an alien
under this paragraph if the Attorney General has reasonable grounds to believe
that the alien--
`(A) is described in section 212(a)(3)(A)(i), 212(a)(3)(A)(iii),
212(a)(3)(B), 237(a)(4)(A)(i), 237(a)(4)(A)(iii), or 237(a)(4)(B); or
`(B) is engaged in any other activity that endangers the
national security of the United States.
`(4) NONDELEGATION- The Attorney General may delegate the
authority provided under paragraph (3) only to the Deputy Attorney General. The
Deputy Attorney General may not delegate such authority.
`(5) COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS- The Attorney General shall
place an alien detained under paragraph (1) in removal proceedings, or shall
charge the alien with a criminal offense, not later than 7 days after the
commencement of such detention. If the requirement of the preceding sentence is
not satisfied, the Attorney General shall release the alien.
`(6) LIMITATION ON INDEFINITE DETENTION- An alien detained
solely under paragraph (1) who has not been removed under section 241(a)(1)(A),
and whose removal is unlikely in the reasonably foreseeable future, may be
detained for additional periods of up to six months only if the release of the
alien will threaten the national security of the United States or the safety of
the community or any person.
`(7) REVIEW OF CERTIFICATION- The Attorney General shall review
the certification made under paragraph (3) every 6 months. If the Attorney
General determines, in the Attorney General's discretion, that the
certification should be revoked, the alien may be released on such conditions
as the Attorney General deems appropriate, unless such release is otherwise
prohibited by law. The alien may request each 6 months in writing that the
Attorney General reconsider the certification and may submit documents or other
evidence in support of that request.
`(b) HABEAS CORPUS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW-
`(1) IN GENERAL- Judicial review of any action or decision
relating to this section (including judicial review of the merits of a
determination made under subsection (a)(3) or (a)(6)) is available exclusively
in habeas corpus proceedings consistent with this subsection. Except as provided
in the preceding sentence, no court shall have jurisdiction to review, by
habeas corpus petition or otherwise, any such action or decision.
`(2) APPLICATION-
`(A) IN GENERAL- Notwithstanding any other provision of law,
including section 2241(a) of title 28, United States Code, habeas corpus
proceedings described in paragraph (1) may be initiated only by an application
filed with--
`(i) the Supreme Court;
`(ii) any justice of the Supreme Court;
`(iii) any circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit; or
`(iv) any district court otherwise having jurisdiction to
entertain it.
`(B) APPLICATION TRANSFER- Section 2241(b) of title 28, United
States Code, shall apply to an application for a writ of habeas corpus described
in subparagraph (A).
`(3) APPEALS- Notwithstanding any other provision of law,
including section 2253 of title 28, in habeas corpus proceedings described in
paragraph (1) before a circuit or district judge, the final order shall be
subject to review, on appeal, by the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit. There shall be no right of appeal in such
proceedings to any other circuit court of appeals.
`(4) RULE OF DECISION- The law applied by the Supreme Court and
the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit shall
be regarded as the rule of decision in habeas corpus proceedings described in
paragraph (1).
`(c) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION- The provisions of this section
shall not be applicable to any other provision of this Act.'.
(b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT- The table of contents of the Immigration
and Nationality Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section
236 the following:
`Sec. 236A. Mandatory detention of suspected terrorist; habeas
corpus; judicial review.'.
(c) REPORTS- Not later than 6 months after the date of the
enactment of this Act, and every 6 months thereafter, the Attorney General
shall submit a report to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of
Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, with respect
to the reporting period, on--
(1) the number of aliens certified under section 236A(a)(3) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act, as added by subsection (a);
(2) the grounds for such certifications;
(3) the nationalities of the aliens so certified;
(4) the length of the detention for each alien so certified; and
(5) the number of aliens so certified who--
(A) were granted any form of relief from removal;
(B) were removed;
(C) the Attorney General has determined are no longer aliens who
may be so certified; or
(D) were released from detention."
The Military Commissions Act of 2006, as mentioned before
authorizes the President to detain anyone, including U.S. citizens, without
charge by designating them enemy combatants or unlawful enemy combatants -
completely eliminating Habeas Corpus.
"SEC. 7. HABEAS CORPUS MATTERS.
‘‘(e)(1) No court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction
to
hear or consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus
filed
by or on behalf of an alien detained by the United States
who
has been determined by the United States to have been
properly
detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such
determination.
‘‘(2) Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) of
section
1005(e) of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (10 U.S.C.
801
note), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to
hear
or consider any other action against the United States or its
agents
relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment,
trial,
or conditions of confinement of an alien who is or was
detained
by the United States and has been determined by the United
States to have been properly detained as an enemy
combatant
or is awaiting such determination.’’
Switching gears a bit, Jerry Brown, has signed bill AB499,
allowing the children of California to get an HPV vaccine without their
parent's consent. If I was a parent in that area, i'd be freaking. Google it if
you don't believe me, this one's too obvious for my analysis.
Next, let's address the food issue. Let me tell you a story.
Once upon a time, there was this chemical plant with the name Monsanto. They
were contacted by the US Government to develop a chemical to spray over the
trees of Vietnam (which I will address later on)
to disintegrate foliage so that the planes can see where the
Vietnamese fighters were -- to bomb them. This caused the death of
an estimated 400,000 Vietnamese people killed or maimed, and 500,000
children born with birth defects. Later on, this same company decided to shift
gears and become the biggest food corporation in the United States.
But they're no average Joe farmer. This company is a producer of genetically
modified foods, you know... seedless watermelon (So farmers can't replant
it, not so you dont have to spit it out!), aluminum resistant plants (So you
can't have your own organic farm & home garden), etc. They patented our
food. Is that normal? NO IT'S NOT NORMAL!
Now to pause this story
to watch what an influence it has become:
Here's a fun fact: Genetically modified food is illegal to grow
in Europe. rBGH, one of Monsanto's creations, has been banned in Canada and
Europe. The United States? They're not even required to TELL us that it's in
our milk, or on our food.
If you want to see another post on the differences in food
quality and ingredients:
Here, I rant about how different the same product can be: Fanta.
It tastes and looks different. The ingredients prove it.
As mentioned before: Vietnam should have never happened. The
United States lost 59,000 men and millions of Vietnamese. You know the Gulf of
Tonkin indecent? Yeah..... That never happened. A document was
declassified from the CIA proving it: www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB132/relea00012.pdf
While I'm ranting, I may as well mention another
controversial topic: 9/11
Charlie Sheen on September 10th, 2009 sent a video to the
president, questioning 9/11. On December 25, 2009, just 3 months later, he was
arrested and a whirlpool of events occurred. From then on, he has been
ridiculed by thousands, possibly millions of Americans - credibility crushed.
Was he targeted? Who knows. Coincidence? Why are you asking me? I'm not going
to spoon feed everything, that's what Google's for!
Lastly, as I will do more reporting on this topic in the future,
take a look outside your cave, often, you'll only be seeing man made clouds
spanning from horizon to horizon. These were sprayed from planes to help
fight global warming.
(Question)"10 megatons of aluminum dumped into the
atmosphere would have no human health impacts"?
(David Keith)"the aluminum nano-particles we have only
began to research and have published nothing.
(Question)"so your telling me that spaying 10 to 20
megatons of aluminum as you said would have no human health effects, he took a
deep breath and swallowed, and said let me be more careful here.
(David Keith)"We haven't done anything serious on aluminua
and there could be something terrible that we find tomorrow that we haven't
looked at".
Who is David Keith:
Some credible sites on the subject.
BNL's generally simplistic explanation for the general public.
This link especially:
An excerpt from "What in the world are they spraying"
The elongated version of my Independent Researchers study.
We let them win. Are you going to take action? Probably not.
If you disagree on my post, feel free to Google it and be wrong.
Or be ignorant and comment below!
No comments:
Post a Comment